“We Made SARS”: Patent Office Evidence (Video)

By Juliet Bonnay
26 August 2021, updated: 27 August 2021

If you want to know the truth you have to dig for it…and keep on digging until all the dots connect, for it is rare to find the whole truth in only one place. Bits and pieces of it can be hidden in the most unlikely places and times of history. In this regard, Dr. David Martin has connected a host of important dots in our understanding of the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, and talks us through the results of his investigation into patents filed from 1999 to 2019 relating to the supposed “novel” coronavirus during an interview with lawyer, Reiner Fuellmich, who is gathering evidence for a class action law suit against those responsible the pandemic. Since something that occurs naturally cannot be patented, and since Dr. Martin has documents that reveal that patents were filed relating to coronavirus going back into the early 2000s, it becomes abundantly clear that this pandemic is not a naturally occurring phenomenon. At 8:40 in the video below, Dr Martin said:

Anthony Fauci and NIAID found the malleability of coronavirus to be a potential candidate for HIV vaccines. And so SARS is actually not a natural progression of a zoonotic modification of coronavirus. As a matter of fact, very specifically in 1999, Anthony Fauci funded research at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, specifically to create…[and this] comes directly from a patent application filed on April 19, 2002 (and you heard the date correctly – 2002) where the NIAID built an infectious, replication defective coronavirus that was specifically targeted for human lung epithelium.

In other words, WE MADE SARS.

And we patented it on April 19, 2002 – before there was ever any alleged outbreak in Asia, which as you know, followed that by several months.

These are very startling and strong words, the implications of which are very far reaching. However as lies, misinformation, and disinformation have continuously swirled around us like autumn leaves in never ending wind eddies since the beginning of this pandemic, it is reasonable to ask: Who is Dr. David Martin and how does he know what he knows?

Dr. Martin is in the business of innovation and its finance. He is Chairman of M·CAM® Innovation Risk Management, which is the world’s largest underwriter of intangible assets used in finance in 168 countries. In his own words:

“In the majority of the countries around the world, our underwriting systems, which include the entire corpus of all patents, patent applications, federal grants, procurement records, e-government records, etc. We have the ability to not only track what is happening and who is involved in what’s happening, but we monitor a series of thematic interests for a variety of organizations, and individuals as well as for our own commercial use… Our business is to monitor the innovation that’s happening around the world, and specifically to monitor the economics of that innovation, the degree to which financial interests are being served, and corporate interests are being dislocated, etc.”

“You need to create the illusion of demand, and there’s nothing right now that does a better job of creating the illusion of demand than the urgency of an event that you’ve manufactured.”

So, during his interview with Fuellmich, Dr. Martin tells the detailed story of the creation of SARS-CoV-2, and everything associated with it, following the trail of patent applications filed with the U.S. Patent Office. He also exposes “criminal conspiracy, racketeering, and collusion” around the filing of some patents, and explains very carefully the synthetic nature of the created SARS genetic sequencing, the implications of which become clearly visible and shocking in their scope. After the video I have made an attempt to connect some important dots that will give greater weight to what Dr. Martin reveals, and hopefully bring you some aha moments.

For now, perhaps the best way to set the scene for what you are about to hear is Dr. Martin’s favorite pandemic quote, a statement made in 2015 by Peter Daszak, head of EcoHealth Alliance, reported in the National Academies of Press publication, February 12, 2016, four years before this pandemic sent the world into a mass state of fear, rolling lockdowns, and the threat of ongoing mandated vaccines:

“We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures, such as a pan corona virus vaccine. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.” ~ Peter Daszak

See partial partial transcript at the end of this post.

To give us pause to ponder over what was happening at the beginning of the pandemic, let’s look at a few of the article headlines that began appearing in February and March of 2020:

Canadian scientist at center of Chinese bio-espionage probe found dead in Africa?

Clues that coronavirus may have leaked from a lab

Who Made Coronavirus? Was It the U.S., Israel or China Itself?

Сoronavirus may be a product of US ‘biological attack’ aimed at Iran & China, IRGC chief claims

Coronavirus shock claim: ‘Smoking gun of Chinese lab leak’ exposed by bioweapons expert

Why was a US military lab handling high-level disease shut down in July 2019?

The official story put out by the U.S. was that the virus had possibly come from bats and exotic-sounding animals like pangolins (a name which no one would easily forget) at the Wuhan market in China. But what interested me most was an article written by Larry Romanoff on March 04, China’s Coronavirus: A Shocking Update. Did The Virus Originate in the US? Romanoff lives in China and viewed the findings of a top Taiwan virologist and pharmacologist who conducted a detailed search for the source of the virus, which was broadcast in February of last year on a Taiwan TV news program. He explained that:

“…the type infecting Taiwan exists only in Australia and the US and, since Taiwan was not infected by Australians, the infection in Taiwan could have come only from the US. The basic logic is that the geographical location with the greatest diversity of virus strains must be the original source because a single strain cannot emerge from nothing. He demonstrated that only the US has all the five known strains of the virus…” (as seen on the map below from Romanoff’s article).

Keeping this in mind, Dr. Martin said in the interview with Fuellmich that “DARPA, the Defence Advance Research Program in the United States, actively took an interest in coronavirus as a “biological weapon” in 2008.

Dr Richard Fleming, during a Doctor’s Covid-19 Roundtable during August this year, stated that SARS-CoV-2 had been “genetically engineered” for this purpose:

What we’ve seen is something that’s been implemented that is an ideal bio-weapon designed to demoralize and defeat people – the enemy, and to cause a slow, smoldering process.

Could this be a possibility? Recall what Dr. Martin said about the patent activity for coronavirus in the early 2000s. Consider that during this time frame, the neoconservatives behind America’s ‘war on terror’ after 911 had been looking for a new “Pearl Harbor” event that would allow them to bring about the radical changes outlined in their Project for A New American Century paper, Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century, published in September, 2000. On page 60, highlighted in yellow, it states:

So now the scene is set for possible ulterior motives behind this pandemic, lets return to Peter Daszak, the man who provided Dr. Martin with his favorite pandemic quote about playing the media hype “to our advantage to get to the real issues.” Daszak heads EcoHealth Alliance, a non-profit international network of scientists headquartered in New York City, that “samples viruses from animals and people in emerging-diseases hotspots across the globe.” One focus of this Alliance is pandemic prevention, but one might question this in light of Daszak’s partial funding of the deeply controversial ‘gain of function’ experiments that caused such a caustic and heated exchange between Senator Rand Paul and Tony Fauci recently. Interestingly, in May last year Fauci said:

If you look at the evolution of the virus in bats and what’s out there now, [the scientific evidence] is very, very strongly leaning toward this could not have been artificially or deliberately manipulated… Everything about the stepwise evolution over time strongly indicates that [this virus] evolved in nature and then jumped species.

Remember what I said about not being able to patent something that occurs naturally in nature. Very clearly what we have learned so far is that SARS-CoV-2 did not evolve over time in nature and then jump species. To understand this, lets connect some important dots focusing on the year 2015.

The following paper was published in Nature Medicine in December of 2015, the same year and about the same month Peter Daszak made the above quote. At the end of the first paragraph it is clear that the idea is planted of an emerging virus presenting a risk to the human population: “Our work suggests a potential risk of SARS-CoV re-emergence from viruses currently circulating in bat populations.” Zhengli-Li Shi, with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, is known as the “bat lady” because of her extensive work with bat viruses. Ralph Baric is associated with the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Peter Daszak liaises with both, as well as Tony Fauci.

The ‘gain of function’ experiments seek to make dangerous viruses more infectious so as to study their effect on human cells. Dr. Martin said in an interview with Robert David Steel that coronaviruses are easy to manipulate, which Peter Daszak had also admitted in an interview in December 2019, just prior to the pandemic. However, as Dr. Martin points out in his Reiner Fuellmich interview at 27:00:

Unfortunately if you actually take what they report to be novel, you find seventy-three patents issued between 2008 and 2019, which have the elements that were allegedly novel in the SARS-coV-2, specifically, as it relates to the polybasic cleavage site, the ACE-II receptor binding domain, and the spike protein.

27:55 – So the clinically novel components of the clinically unique, clinically contagious…you now where I’m going with this, okay… there was no outbreak of SARS because we had engineered all of the elements of that, and by 2016, the paper that was funded during the gain of function moratorium that said that the SARS Coronavirus was poised for human emergence, written by none other than Ralph Baric, was not only poised for human emergence, but it was patented for commercial exploitation – 73 times.

28:50 – Reiner Fuellmich: Ralph Baric…I think I saw a video clip with him giving a speech in which he explicitly told the audience that you can make a lot of money with this.

Enter Bill Gates who admitted in an article he wrote himself in January, 2019 that vaccines were “The best investment I ever made,” and had brought him a 20:1 return on his investments. It is how he turned an investment of $10 billion into $200 billion worth of economic benefit.

What are the chances that it could have been a coincidence that in March, 2015 Bill Gates had already begun talking about the need to prepare for pandemics. Remember, he is not a doctor. In the video below he says:

4:29 – “The source of the virus could be a natural epidemic like ebola, or it could be bio-terrorism.”
6:45 – We need to do simulations – germ games, not war games, so that we see where the holes are. The last time a germ game was done in the United States was in 2001. It didn’t go so well. (Keep that date in mind as Dr. Martin talks us through the patent filings.)

Robert Kennedy Jr reported on April 9th, 2020 about Bill Gates’ disastrous polio vaccine program in India:

Promising to eradicate Polio with $1.2 billion, Gates took control of India’s National Advisory Board (NAB) and mandated 50 polio vaccines (up from 5) to every child before age 5. Indian doctors blame the Gates campaign for a devastating vaccine-strain polio epidemic that paralyzed 496,000 children between 2000 and 2017. In 2017, the Indian Government dialed back Gates’ vaccine regimen and evicted Gates and his cronies from the NAB. Polio paralysis rates dropped precipitously. In 2017, the World Health Organization reluctantly admitted that the global polio explosion is predominantly vaccine strain, meaning it is coming from Gates’ Vaccine Program. The most frightening epidemics in Congo, the Philippines, and Afghanistan are all linked to Gates’ vaccines. By 2018, ¾ of global polio cases were from Gates’ vaccines.

Going back to Eisenhower’s 1961 warning about the growing power of the Military Industrial Complex during his farewell speech, his words could also include the pharmaceutical industry attached to it, for at that time pharma was involved in the CIA’s mind control programs that included MK-ULTRA. The Military Industrial Complex needed continuing wars to maintain the lucrative economic gains they had made during WWII. Lies were told to convince the American people of the necessity for each war. For instance, you may remember watching a tearful testimony of a Kuwaiti nurse who ‘witnessed’ the horrors of Saddam’s regime, which swayed public opinion against him and gave the green light to President H.W. Bush to wage the first war on Iraq in 1990.

‘Nurse Nayirah’ needed to protect her identity because she was in fact the 15-year-old daughter of the Kuwaiti Ambassador in Washington. She was professionally trained by advertising agency Hill and Knowlton to tell the entire fake incubator story. The lies continued which led to the invasion of Afghanistan and the second invasion of Iraq shortly afterwards, sending young men and women into wars from which the Military Industrial Complex stood to make billions in economic gains.

Going back to the summer of 1963, Lee Harvey Oswald (JFK’s accused assassin) makes it startlingly clear about what was happening at that time, and about the coup that was about to take place to ensure that the Military Industrial Complex wouldn’t be cheated out of making billions by Kennedy’s withdrawal of troops from Vietnam. At the time, Oswald was assisting in a highly secret “Project” to make a cancer-causing bio-weapon to kill Castro, which rising star scientist, Judyth Vary Baker, was working on with Dr. Alton Ochsner, Dr. Mary Sherman, and Dave Ferrie. In her book, Me and Lee: How I Came to Know, Love, and Lose, Lee Harvey Oswald, Baker wrote:

“I’m now going to confide in you,” Lee said… “I am going to trust you, I’ve done that with no one. I tell you this: They want to assassinate Kennedy in Florida, or Texas. They’ll show what happens to somebody who doesn’t play their game.”

“Dave [Ferrie] was right. If Kennedy dies, a new system of government will take over. It will exist to generate profit; mostly by waging wars that will not result in clear victories. It’s the old Orwellian idea. Today we’re at war with Oceania. We’ve always been at war with Oceania. Tomorrow we’re at war with East Asia. We’ve always been at war with East Asia…”

… “JFK is slow to wage war. That’s a man worth taking risks for.” (p. 385)

Just as war is big business for the Military Industrial Complex, people’s ill-health is big business for the pharma industry. If people suddenly became healthy, pharma would be unable to generate the billions in profits they currently do. What is especially chilling about this is that at the time Eisenhower made his famous speech, his administration had covered up the fact that the Salk polio vaccines administered in the fifties contained a cancer-causing monkey virus (SV-40). Ninety-eight million vaccine doses were contaminated and not recalled. Created in the wake of this was a booming cancer research industry to deal with the explosion of soft tissue cancers decades later. This was a huge scandal that JFK inherited when he became president, leading to the little known story of how the SV-40 virus was turned into a bio-weapon in an attempt to kill Castro, which is how Judyth Vary Baker met Lee Harvey Oswald. She was co-opted into working on this bio-weapon ‘Project’ to resolve the problem they were having with cross-species transfer. (p. 255, Me and Lee)

Now, fast forward to when SARS-CoV-2 arrived on the scene early in 2020. There were already known inexpensive treatments for it, such as Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine. As early as 2005 Chloroquine was a known inhibitor of SARS coronavirus. In fact, it was even featured in a TV series called The Dead Zone in 2003 in an episode entitled Plague. The screen play was written by Stephen King and Jeffrey Boam, who claimed that the information and research used to make this episode came directly from the CDC in 2003. Briefly, the main character, Johnny Smith (Christopher Walken), had awakened from a coma after a car accident to later discover that he has psychic abilities. The following selection of clips from the show opens with Johnny at a school science fair where he becomes agitated by a vision of seeing many children extremely sick.This is a jaw-dropping compilation of the episode using all the terms we are now most familiar with today.

As you can see below, Chloroquine, a cheap and effective treatment for SARS coronavirus in 2005, has now been ‘outlawed’ to make way for a new drug that would bring in huge profits for pharma.

We were also steered away from another effective and inexpensive drug, Ivermectin, successfully used to treat Covid-19 in India, as the following graphs show, comparing India to the U.S. to August this year.

These graphs were included in an article by By Dr. Justus R. Hope, India’s Ivermectin Blackout. Censorship of Peer-reviewed Analysis, which begins:

News of India’s defeat of the Delta variant should be common knowledge. It is just about as obvious as the nose on one’s face. It is so clear when one looks at the graphs that no one can deny it.

Yet, for some reason, we are not allowed to talk about it. Thus, for example, Wikipedia cannot mention the peer-reviewed meta-analyses by Dr. Tess Lawrie or Dr. Pierre Kory published in the American Journal of Therapeutics. See this.

Wikipedia is not allowed to publish the recent meta-analysis on Ivermectin authored by Dr. Andrew Hill. Furthermore, it is not allowed to say anything concerning www.ivmmeta.com showing the 61 studies comprising 23,000 patients which reveal up to a 96% reduction in death [prophylaxis] with Ivermectin. See this.

Finally now there are consequences for denying people treatment with this highly effective medication, as WHO’s chief scientist, Dr. Soumya Swaminathan has been charged with mass murder. Dr. Paul Craig Roberts, a former member of the Reagan administration, opens his August 24 article, Indian Bar Association Charges WHO Chief Scientist for Mass Murder, with the following:

As I posted this morning, Florida’s governor Ron DeSantis pulled the rug out from under the lying scum that constitutes the American medical establishment by establishing throughout Florida medical centers that cure Covid instead of spreading it with vaccination. Now it has happened again. This time in faraway India.

The Indian Bar Association is charging WHO chief scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan with the mass murder of Indians.  Dr. Swaminathan spoke against the use of Ivermectin in the Tamil Nadu province with the consequence that Ivermectin’s use was blocked and Covid cases skyrocketed with deaths increasing ten-fold.

In the provinces where Ivermectin was used—Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, and Goa— Covid cases declined sharply by 98%, 97%, 94%, and 86%. This success, which cleared large areas of India from Covid, was kept from you by the New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC, NPR, AMA, Biden, Schumer, Pelosi, and the rest of the criminals who control the narrative. Acting for the Indian Bar Association, Dipali Ojha said the WHO official is accused of misconduct because she used her position as a public health official to further the agenda of special interests to maintain an Emergency Use Authorization for the lucrative vaccine industry.  (Emphasis, mine)

To further expose the lies and manipulations behind the scenes by those who are profiting from deaths, disabilities and injuries caused by so-called ‘vaccines’ to stop the virus, in May this year a number of Tony Fauci’s emails were released – the following one questioning possible engineering of the virus:

I also came across this exchange between Fauci and Daszak in April, 2020:

After both Fauci and Daszak spent last year denying the ‘lab leak’ theory, and it was fact-checked out of existence, this year Fauci backtracked and said on May 11 that “he is ‘not confident’ the virus developed naturally and he is ‘perfectly in favour’ of any investigation that looks into the origin of the virus.” This is probably a guise to distract us from the truth which, is as Dr. Martin said at 45:20 in this interview:

…the illusion that we continue to unfortunately see very well-meaning people get trapped in, is conversations about whether we are having a vaccine for a virus. The fact of the matter is we are not. We are injecting a spike protein mRNA…sequence, which is a computer simulation. It is not derived from nature, it’s a computer simulation of a sequence which has been known and patented for years.

From all this, it is evident that there is far more going on behind the scenes than meets the eye. While many people stand to make fortunes from this pandemic, other murky things lurk in the darkness beyond our awareness. There is the “Reset” crowd that sees the pandemic as their own “Pearl Harbor” moment to usher in the changes that will see us “own nothing and be happy.” Does this mean that after we have been collectively milked of billions of dollars for ongoing vaccines and booster shots, left without jobs to pay off mortgages or even pay the rent after one lockdown rolls into the next until we reach such an impoverished state we will have to forfeit our houses and properties too…and then perhaps everything else until we “own nothing”? See what is waiting for us down the road if and when the United Nation’s Agenda 21, that 178 countries signed onto in 1992, is fully implemented. Perhaps you could also check out what the Rockefeller Foundation planned for us during a pandemic in its 2010 paper: Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development, pages 18-21. It certainly appears to me that a certain group of people really worked hard to orchestrate this pandemic for personal gain.

PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT

Dr. Martin is Chairman of M·CAM® Innovation Risk Management.

“From a corporate standpoint, we have since 1998 been the world’s largest underwriter of intangible assets used in finance in 168 countries. In the majority of the countries around the world, our underwriting systems, which include the entire corpus of all patents, patent applications, federal grants, procurement records, e-government records, etc. We have the ability to not only track what is happening and who is involved in what’s happening, but we monitor a series of thematic interests for a variety of organizations, and individuals as well as for our own commercial use… Our business, is to monitor the innovation that’s happening around the world, and specifically to monitor the economics of that innovation, the degree to which financial interests are being served, and corporate interests are being dislocated, etc. Our business is the business of innovation and its finance.”

3:00 – We have reviewed the over 4,000 patents that have been issued around SARS Coronavirus, and we have done a very comprehensive review of the financing of all of the manipulations of coronavirus which gave rise to SARS as a sub-clade of the beta coronavirus family.

4:00 – “We took the reported gene sequence, which was reportedly isolated as a novel coronavirus, indicated as such by the ICTV – the Internation Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses at the World Health Organization. We took the actual genetic sequences, that were reportedly “novel” and reviewed those against the patent records that were available as of the spring of 2020. And what we found…are over a 120 patented pieces of evidence to suggest that the declaration of a “novel” coronavirus was actually entirely a fallacy. There was no “novel” coronavirus. There are countless very subtle modifications of coronavirus sequences that have been uploaded. But there was no single identified “novel” coronavirus at all. As a matter of fact, we found records in the patent records, of sequences attributed to “novelty” going to patents that were sought as early as 1999. So, not only was this a novel anything, …it’s not been novel for over two decades.”

6:00 – Work in this area began in the veterinarian sciences leading up to 1999.  This is where the patent activity began in coronaviruses. 

6:08 – The first vaccine ever patented for coronavirus was actually sought by Pfizer…which was specifically this S-spike protein – so the exact same thing that we allegedly have rushed into invention – the first application was filed in January 28, 2000 – 21 years ago. This was for the canine coronavirus.

8:40 – Anthony Fauci and NIAID found the malleability of coronavirus to be a potential candidate for HIV vaccines. And so SARS is actually not a natural progression of a zoonotic modification of coronavirus. As a matter of fact, very specifically, in 1999, Anthony Fauci funded research at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, specifically to create an…comes directly from a patent application filed on April 19, 2002 (and you heard the date correctly…2002) where the NIAID built an infectious, replication defective coronavirus that was specifically targeted for human lung epithelium. In other words, WE MADE SARS. And we patented it on April 19, 2002 – before there was ever any alleged outbreak in Asia, which as you know, followed that by several months. That patent, issued as U.S. Patent 7279327…clearly lays out in very specific gene sequencing, the fact the we knew the ACE receptor, the ACE-2 binding domain, the S-1 spike protein and other elements of what we have come to know as this scourge pathogen, was not only engineered, but could be synthetically modified in the laboratory using nothing more than gene sequencing technologies, taking computer code and turning it into a pathogen or an intermediate of the pathogen. And that technology was funded exclusively in the early days, as a means by which we could actually harness coronavirus as a vector to distribute HIV vaccine.

11:40 – My organization was asked to monitor biological and chemical weapons treaty violations in he very early days of 2000 – you’ll remember the anthrax events in September of 2001, and we were part of an investigation that gave rise to the congressional inquiry into not only the anthrax origins, but also into what was unusual behaviour around Bayers’ sipplofloxithran drug, which was the drug used as a potential treatment for anthrax poisoning.

12:24 – Throughout the fall of 2001, we began monitoring an enormous number of bacterial and viral pathogens that were being patented through NIH, NIAID, US AMRID, the US armed services infectious disease program, and a number of other agencies internationally that collaborated with them, and our concern was that coronavirus was being seen as not only a potentially manipulable agent for potential use as a vaccine vector, but it was also very clearly being considered as a biological weapon candidate… Our first public reporting on this took place prior to the first SARS outbreak in the latter part of 2001, so you can imagine how disappointed I am to be sitting here 20 years later, having 20 years earlier, pointed out there was a problem looming on the horizon with respect to coronavirus.

14:12 – The alleged outbreak [of SARS] that took place in China in 2002 going into 2003 gave rise to a very problematic April 2003 filing by the United States Center for Disease Control and Prevention, and this topic is of critical importance to get the nuance very precise, because in addition to filing the entire sequence on what became SARS Coronaviris, which is actually a violation of 35 US Code, Section 101, You cannot patent a naturally occurring substance… [listed patent numbers…]

15:42 – These patents not only covered the gene sequence of SARS Coronavirus, but also covered the means of detecting it, using RTPCR. Now the reason why that’s a problem is if you actually both own the patent on the gene itself, and you own the patent on its detection, you have a cunning advantage to be able to control one hundred percent the providence of not only the virus itself, bit also it detection – meaning you have entire scientific and message control. And this patent, sought by the CDC, was allegedly justified by their public relations team so that everyone would be free to research coronavirus. Then only problem with that statement is that it’s a lie. And the reason why it’s a lie is because the patent office, not once but twice, rejected the patent on the gene sequence as unpatentable because the gene sequence was already in the public domain. In other words, prior to CDC’s filing for a patent, the patent office found 99.9 percent identity with the already existing corona virus recorded in the public domain, and over the rejection of the patent examiner, and after having to pay an appeal fine in 2006 and 2007, the CDC overrode the patent office’s rejection of their patent and ultimately in 2007, got the patent on SARS Coronavirus.

17:45 – So, every public statement that CDC has made that said that this was in the public interest, is falsifiable by their own paid bribe to the patent office. This is not something that’s subtle, and to make matters worse, they paid an additional fee to keep their application private. Last time I checked if you’re trying to make information available for the public research, you would not pay a fee to keep the information private.

18:13 – I wish I could have made up anything I just said, but all of that is available in the public patent archive record, which any member of the public can review. And the public pair, as it’s called at the United States Patent Office, has not only the evidence, but the actual documents, which I have in my possession.

18:35 – Now, this is critically important…because fact checkers have repeatedly stated that the novel coronavirus, designated as SARS-coV-2, is in fact distinct from the CDC patent. And here’s both the genetic and the patent problem. If you look at the gene sequence that is filed by CDC in 2003, again in 2005, and then again in 2006, what you find is identity in somewhere between 89 to 99 percent of the sequence overlaps that have been identified in what’s called the “novel” sub-clade of SARS-coV-2. What we know is that the core designation of SARS Coronaviris, which is actually the clade of the beta Coronavirus family, and the sub-clade that has been called SAR-coV-2, have to overlap from a taxonomic point of view. You cannot have SARS designation on a thing without it first being SARS.

19:57 – So the disingenuous fact checking that has been done saying somehow or other CDC had nothing to do with this particular patent, or this particular pathogen is beyond both the literal credibility of the published sequences, and it’s also beyond credulity when it comes to the ICTV taxonomy because it very clearly states that this is in fact a sub-clade of the clade called SARS Coronavirus.

20:27 – Now, what’s important is on the 28 April…[and] this date is problematic, three days after CDC filed the patent on the SARS Coronavirus in 2003, three days later Sequoia Pharmaceutical, a company that was set up in Maryland, Sequoia Pharmaceuticals on the 28 April 2003, filed a patent on agents of treatment and control of infections by Coronavirus. CDC filed three days earlier, and then the treatment was available three days later. Now, just hold that thought for a second…

Sequoia Pharmaceuticals and ultimately Ablynx Pharmaceuticals, became rolled into the proprietary holdings of Pfizer, [?], and Johnson and Johnson.

20:43 – So ask yourself a simple question: How would one have a patent on a treatment for a thing that had been invented three days earlier? The patent in question, the April 28, 2003 patent number 7151163, issued to Sequoia Pharmaceuticals, has another problem. The problem is it was issued and published before the CDC patent on Coronavirus was actually allowed. So the degree to which the information could have been known by any means other than insider information between those parties, is zero. It is not physically possible for you to patent a thing that treats a thing that had not been published because CDC had paid to keep it secret. This, my friends, is the definition of criminal conspiracy, racketeering, and collusion. This is not a theory; this is evidence.  You cannot have information in the future and form a treatment for a thing that did not exist.

23:15 – Reiner Fuellmich – This could well blow up into a RICO case ultimately.

Martin: It is a RICO case. And the RICO pattern, which was established in April of 2003 for the first Coronavirus, was played out to exactly the same schedule when we see SARS-coV-2 show up, when we have Moderna getting the spike protein sequence by phone from the Vaccine Research Center at NIAID prior to the definition of the novel sub-clade. How to you treat a thing before you actually have the thing?

24:10  – On the 5^th June 2008, which is an important date because it is actually around the time when DARPA, the Defence Advance Research Program in the United States, actively took an interest in coronavirus as a biological weapon. June 5, 2008, Ablynx, as you know is part of Sanofi, filed a series of patents that specifically targeted what we’ve been told is the novel feature of the SARS-coV-2 virus… Specifically they targeted what was called the polybasic cleavage site for SARS-coV, the novel spike protein and the ACE-II receptor binding domain, which is allegedly novel to SARS-coV-2. And all of that was patented on the 5^th June, 2008, and those patents in sequence were issued between November 24, 2015, which was U.S. Patent 9193780 – so that one came out after the gain of function moratorium, that one came after the MERS outbreak in the Middle East, but what you find is that then in 2016, 2017, 2019 a series of patents all covering – not only the RNA strands but also the sub-components of the gene strands, were all issued to Ablynx and Sanofi. And then we have Crucell [now Janssen Vaccines], we have […] Therapeutics, we have Children’s Medical Corporation, we have countless others that include… all identifying in patent filings that ranged from 2008 until 2017, every attribute that was allegedly uniquely published by the single referenced publication – “The Novel Bat Coronavirus,” – reveals quote: “Natural insertions of the S1S2 to cleavage site of the spike protein and possible recombinant three origin of the SARS-coV-2 virus” – the paper that has been routinely used to identify the novel virus. Unfortunately if you actually take what they report to be novel, you find seventy-three patents issued between 2008 and 2019, which have the elements that were allegedly novel in the SARS-coV-2, specifically, as it relates to the polybasic cleavage site, the ACE-II receptor binding domain, and the spike protein.

27:55 – So the clinically novel components of the clinically unique, clinically contagious…you now where I’m going with this, okay… there was no outbreak of SARS because we had engineered all of the elements of that, and by 2016, the paper that was funded during the gain of function moratorium that said that the SARS Coronavirus was poised for human emergence, written by none other than Ralph Baric, was not only poised for human emergence, but it was patented for commercial exploitation – 73 times.

28:50 – Reiner Fuellmich: Ralph Baric…I think I saw a video clip with him giving a speech in which he explicitly told the audience that you can make a lot of money with this.

29:01 – Dr. Martin:  Yes, you can. And he has made a lot of money doing this… So, for those who want to live in the illusion that somehow or another, that’s the end of the story, be prepared for a greater disappointment, because somebody knew something in 2015 and 2016, which gave rise to my favourite quote of this entire pandemic, and by that I’m not being ‘cute’.  My favourite quote of this pandemic was a statement made in 2015 by Peter Daszak, reported in the National Academies of Press publication, February 12, 2016:

“We need to increase public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures, such as a pan corona virus vaccine. A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.

31:35 – Peter Daszak, the person who independently collaborated with the Chinese non-lab leak non-theory because there wasn’t a lab leak. This was an intentional bio-weaponization of spike proteins to inject into people to get them addicted to a pan coronavirus vaccine. This has nothing to do with a pathogen that was released, and every study that’s ever been launched to try to verify a lab-leak, is a red herring.

32:10 – There is nothing new. Seventy-three patents on everything clinically novel. Seventy-three all issued before November 19. And I’m going to give you the biggest bombshell of all to prove that this was actually not a release of anything because patent 7279327, the patent on the recombinant nature of that lung-targeting coronavirus was transferred mysteriously from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, to the National Institutes of Health in 2018. Now, here’s the problem with that. Under the Bayh-Dole Act, the U.S. Government already has what’s called a “march-in rights provision.” That means that of the government has paid for research, they are entitled to benefit from that research at their demand, or at their whim. So explain why, in 2017 and 2018, suddenly the National Institutes of Health have to take ownership of the patent they already had rights to, held by the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill? An how did they need to file the certificate of correction to make sure that it was legally enforceable, because there was a typographical error in the grant reference in the first filing, so they needed to make sure that not only did they get it right, but they needed to make sure every typographical error that was contained in the patent was correct. On the single paten required to develop the Vaccine Research Institute’s mandate, which was shared between the University of Carolina, Chapel Hill in November of 2019 and Moderna in Novermber of 2019, when UNC Chapel Hill, NIAID and Moderna began the sequencing of a spike protein vaccine – a month before an outbreak ever happened.

34:30 – Reiner Fuellmich: You have all the evidence, right?

34:37 – Dr. Martin: Yep.

34:39 – Reiner Fuellmich: So it’s all about money.

34:50 – Dr. Martin: It has always been about money. And just to answer a question that was asked slightly earlier: the script for this was written first January 6, 2004…

Reiner Fuellmich:  Who wrote the script?

Dr. Martin:  Merck. At the conference called “SARS and Bio-Terrorism: Bio-terrorism and emerging infectious diseases, antimicrobials, therapeutics and immune modulators.”  Merck introduced the notion of what they called “The New Normal,” which is the language that became the branded campaign that was adopted by the World Health Organization, the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, which was the board upon which the Chinese director for Center of Disease Control, Bill Gates’ Dr. Alias of the Gates’ Foundation and Anthony Fauci sat together on that board of directors. But the first introduction of “The New Normal” campaign, which was about getting people to accept a universal pan influenza/pan coronavirus vaccine, was actually adopted in January 6, 2004. So, it’s been around quite a long time.

36:20 – I’m not going to belabour many more points other than to say that it was very clear that… Moderna knew that it was going to be placed in the front of the line with the respect to the development of a vaccine in March of 2019. And this is a very important date, because in March of 2019, for reasons that are not transparent, they suddenly amended a series of rejected patent filings. It is a very bizarre behavior. But they amended a number of patent filings to specifically make reference to an intentional or accidental…sorry, their term “deliberate release” of coronavirus. So in March, they amended four failed patent applications to begin the process of a coronavirus vaccine development. And they began dealing with a very significant problem that they had, which was they relied on technology that they did not own. Two Canadian companies… actually own the patent on the lipid nanoparticle envelope that’s required to deliver the injection of the mRNA fragment. And those patents have been issued both in Canada and in the U.S. and around the world in their […] property equivalents. Moderna knew that they did not own the rights and began trying to negotiate with Arbutus and Acuitas to get the resolution of the lipid particle nanoparticle patented technology available to be put into a vaccine, and we know as I made reference to before, that in November they entered into a research and cooperative research development agreement with Chapel Hill with respect to getting the spike protein to put inside the lipid nanoparticle so that they actually had a candidate vaccine before we had a pathogen, allegedly, that was running around.

42:40 – It was Moderna’s patent applications that were amended in March 2019 to include the deliberate release of a repertory pathogen language.

44:38 – In 2008 the WHO had declared that the coronavirus had been eradicated. 

45:20 – Population control….  Martin:

“This was seen as a highly malleable bio-weapon. There is no question that by 2005 it was unquestionably a weapon of choice. And the illusion that we continue to unfortunately see very well-meaning people get trapped in, is conversations about whether we are having a vaccine for a virus. The fact of the matter is we are not. We are injecting a spike protein mRNA…sequence, which is a computer simulation. It is not derived from nature, it’s a computer simulation of a sequence which has been known and patented for years, and what we know is that sequence as reported, is reported across things like, you know, very reliable phone conversations that took place between Moderna and the vaccine research center…

46:50 – The evidence makes it abundantly clear, there has been no effort by any pharmaceutical company, to combat the virus. This is about getting people injected with the known to be harmful S-1 spike protein.

47:39 – When Anthony Fauci tried desperately to get some of his synthetic RNA vaccines published, he had his own patents rejected by the patent office. This is what the patent office told him when NIAID’s own Anthony Fauci thought he could get an mRNA-like vaccine patented as a vaccine:

These arguments are persuasive to the extent that an antigenic peptide stimulates an immune response that may produce antibodies that bind to a specific peptide or protein, but it is not persuasive in regards to a vaccine… The immune response produced by a vaccine must be more than merely some immune response, but must also be protective. As noted in the previous office action, the […] recognizes the  term “vaccine” to be a compound which prevents infection. Applicant has not demonstrated that the instantly claimed vaccine meets even the lower standard set forth in the specification, let alone the standard […] definition of being operative in regards. Therefore, claims five, seven and nine are not operative as the anti-HIV vaccine [which he was working on] is not patentable utility.”

In other words Fauci’s proposed vaccine does not meet the patentable standard, the legal standard, or the clinical standard.

1:14:07 – Martin:

“You need to create the illusion of demand, and there’s nothing right now that does a better job of creating the illusion of demand than the urgency of an event that you’ve manufactured.”

---

Related

---