World Affairs

Planting the Seed for 9/11 In The American Mind

Updated: 1 July 2021

In the 1978 movie, The Medusa Touch, Richard Burton plays a character who used mind control to crash a passenger plane into a New York skyscraper. Screenshot from the movie.

Novels and the surreal world of Hollywood movies and television can sow seeds of a future reality most would find impossible to imagine in real life. These seeds, however, can remain dormant for years in carefully prepared fertile soil, where, given the right opportunities, can suddenly grow into terrifying realities that leave us numb and speechless, and unable to act. It was just a horror movie…right? Fiction?

When I read George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four in the sixties, never in my wildest imagination did I ever think that something akin to a ‘Big Brother’ surveillance state could ever become a sinister reality. And in 2014, the bearers of news in New Zealand that we could lose our sovereignty because of it largely fell mostly on the deaf ears of people in denial that surveillance could ever take away our freedom. After all, wasn’t it just used to catch the terrorists before they did us harm?

Similarly, those who watched a 1978 horror movie starring Richard Burton in The Medusa Touch probably never imagined in their wildest dreams that a scene from a Hollywood movie could ever happen in ‘real’ life. Nevertheless, Burton plants the first seed for 9/11 by playing the role of a man who possesses the power to cause disasters simply by thinking about them and, in the following horrifying scene, causes a passenger jet to crash into a New York skyscraper.

Another 9/11 seed was planted on 4 March 2001, when the Murdoch-owned Fox Network aired the first of a 13-part series of The Lone Gunmen called Pilot. A computer hacker, working for a secret cabal within the government, takes remote control of a Boeing 727 passenger plane with the intention of crashing it into one of the World Trade Center towers.

The truth revealed in this episode was that America needed an enemy to generate more arms sales. Perhaps you may recall Eisenhower’s chilling warning about the rise of the Military Industrial Complex in his Farewell Address in 1961:

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists, and will persist.

Now this conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence—economic, political, even spiritual—is felt in every city, every Statehouse, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet, we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources, and livelihood are all involved. So is the very structure of our society.

Within this speech a seed is sown of potential danger and threat lurking within the establishment of a new arms industry. But such an industry has to convince the public of its right to exist. Since it is there for protection, it must convince the people that there is in fact an enemy from whom they need protecting. This is why Communist Soviet Russia, an ally during WWII, became an enemy through manufactured fear – firstly of communism, and then a possible Soviet nuclear attack on American soil. Some of you may even recall the drills at school and the actions adults were told to take when sirens sounded warnings of an imminent Soviet nuclear attack. I wonder what went through little children’s minds during drills that had them ducking under the cover of their desks to escape the fallout from such bombs. Did it also program them to “duck and cover” in every threatening situation for the rest of their lives?

At the beginning of Massimo Mazzucco’s revealing documentary about the historical underpinnings of 9/11 and the neocons’ Project For A New American Century, film clips shown in movie theaters during the 1950s give instructions on what to do during a Soviet nuclear attack.

During the 1970s terrorists began hijacking passenger planes in other parts of the world. But who were these terrorists? Americans would find out through a horror movie released the year before The Medusa Touch, in 1977. In Black Sunday terrorism came to American shores in the form of a group of Palestinian Arab terrorists called the Black September Movement. Their plan was to detonate explosives and poisoned shrapnel loaded into the Good Year blimp’s cabin as it flew over the Super Bowl stadium packed with eighty thousand people.

The chilling message Black September members sent to Americans was this: 

People of America, this situation is unbearable for us. Until you understand that and stop helping the Israelis with arms and money, we of the Black September Movement will make it unbearable for you.

In Black Sunday, terrified people ran in blind panic to get out of the stadium. The seed planted in the American mind was that Arabs were terrorists, and terrorists could strike at any time, anywhere. However, unbeknown to anyone at the time, the propagandizing of Arabs as terrorists was linked to an institute founded by Benjamin Netanyahu and his father in Israel in September 1976. It was called the Jonathan Institute in memory of Netanyahu’s brother, Jonathan, who was killed during the 1976 Israeli raid on Entebbe, Uganda to free hijacked Air France hostages. Wayne Madsen dived beneath the surface of this story to reveal:

The Israel raid, according to classified documents prepared by British diplomat D. H. Colvin on June 30, 1976, three days after the hijacking, suggested that Israel conducted the hijacking by infiltrating Shin Bet agents into the ranks of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and using them as dupes in carrying out a hijacking arranged by the Israelis.  The goal of the “false flag” hijacking was to create an event designed to whip up support in France for Israel. [1]

What about a seed sown for the collapse of towering financial symbols? It just so happens that by the end of the movie Fight Club, released in 1999, Fight Club has become a domestic terrorist organization. The last scene shows two of the leading characters standing at a penthouse window holding hands, forming an “M” for “project Mayhem,” while watching the controlled demolition of skyscrapers housing banks that had made them financially impotent through credit card debt.

As you can see, powerful images planted seeds in the American mind of a 9/11-type event. Now let us delve deeper into Orwell’s Nineteen-Eighty-Four and the seeds it contains for a post-9/11 world, also keeping in mind Eisenhower’s warning about the growing influence of the Military Industrial Complex.

Perhaps like me, the concept of a ‘Big Brother’ constantly watching you was what stayed in your mind years after reading Orwell’s book. Maybe it reminded you of Stalin’s Soviet Union where a dissenter could be dragged off unexpectedly to languish for years in the Gulags that Solzhenitsyn wrote so powerfully about.

But do you remember reading a chapter War Is Peace in the ‘book within the book’ titled The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism? I must have glossed over this in my twenties as being totally in the realm of the unreal of the unreal. (Yes, I deliberately repeated that.) Perhaps it was more likely that I had no idea what ‘oligarchical collectivism’ was. However, it is vitally important that we understand what it is now and how it could play out in the post-Covid-19 world. If you cannot remember it, I urge you to read it again so you will begin to recognize within Orwell’s dystopian nightmare glimpses of the world we are living in today, and the real reasons behind the War On Terror that Hillary Clinton suggested would last for at least thirty years…if not a century. The following selected passages from Orwell’s book should disturb us all…

The primary aim of modern warfare is to use up the products of the machine without raising the general standard of living.

… The problem was how to keep the wheels of industry turning without increasing the real wealth of the world. Goods must be produced, but they must not be distributed. And in practice the only way of achieving this was by continuous warfare. The essential act of war is destruction, not necessarily of human lives, but of the products of human labour. War is a way of shattering to pieces, or pouring into the stratosphere, or sinking in the depths of the sea, materials which might otherwise be used to make the masses too comfortable, and hence, in the long run, too intelligent.

… The social atmosphere is that of a besieged city, where the possession of a lump of horseflesh makes the difference between wealth and poverty. And at the same time the consciousness of being at war, and therefore in danger, makes the handing-over of all power to a small caste seem the natural, unavoidable condition of survival.

It makes me wonder now if Orwell was privy to some of the machinations behind the political façade at the time he wrote his book, which was published in 1949. Did Orwell sow seeds for an already planned future reality? Was he trying to warn us of what was heading our way in the not-too-distant future so we would recognize the signs and take effective action to thwart the plans? Was ‘Big Brother’ a ‘one world government’ which Stalin (like Putin later) wanted nothing to do with? And was this why the Pentagon began secretly plotting in 1942 to “wipe the Soviet Union off the map” with 204 atomic bombs against 66 major cities?

Fred Warburg was the publisher of Nineteen-Eighty-Four. It was he who suggested this title rather than Orwell’s “The Last Man in Europe.” Orwell was sick with tuberculosis at the time he wrote it and had to push himself to finish it, even though he was dissatisfied with the way it was coming together. I wonder now whether it was a commissioned book after reading that Fred Warburg belonged to the Fabian Society, formed in 1884 with a secret goal to establish “an atheistic, classless, socialist society, which would prepare the way for the final victory – communism.” [2]

It was to this end the Fabians formed the Labour Party in Britain in 1906, and by 1918 it had taken over all the main ideas of the Fabian Society. With the insignia of a wolf in sheep’s clothing, the Fabians introduced social welfare programs designed to attract the working class vote, with the intention of later dismantling them.

Fabianism spread to other countries, including the United States, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Denmark, Germany, Spain and India. Famous Fabians include George Bernard Shaw, H.G. Wells, Walter Lippmann, Bertrand Russell, Julian Huxley, Aldous Huxley and economist John Maynard Keynes. Ramsey MacDonald (British prime minister 1924, 1929-35), Dean Acheson (Truman’s Secretary of State, who played a central role in defining American foreign policy during the Cold War), Harold Wilson (British prime minister from 1964 to 1970 and 1974 to 1976), as well as Prime Minister Tony Blair, were also Fabians. [3] Coincidentally, George Orwell’s real name was Eric Blair.

Speaking of coincidences, the name Warburg also featured among the bankers who financed the Bolsheviks and Nazis. It was Max Warburg who played an important role in funding the Communist propaganda in Russia. [4]

Paul Warburg in New York was one of the founders of the Federal Reserve in 1913, whom President Wilson appointed Vice-Governor of the Federal Reserve System, and then approved the Warburg amendment, thereby converting the system into a central bank with authority to fix and regulate America’s economy. [5] And it was Paul Warburg’s son, James Warburg, who testified before the US Senate on February 17, 1950 and bluntly stated:

“We will have a world government whether you like it or not. The only question is whether that government will be achieved by conquest or consent.”

President George H.W. Bush, whose father Prescott Bush also financially supported the rise of Nazis, presented the idea of a world government – a “New World Order” – at the beginning of the U.S. wars in the Middle East. Coincidentally, he included this “New World Order” idea in his speech before a joint session of Congress on September 11, 1990 at the beginning of the Gulf War, and in his speech on September 11, 1991 at the end of it (below). Seems like the Bushes just love that date.

“We are Americans,” he said, “part of something larger than ourselves… What is at stake is more than one small country. It is a big idea. A New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause, to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind: peace and security, freedom, and the rule of law… Tonight we work to achieve another victory: a victory over tyranny and savage aggression.”


Was the goal of this war to destroy the whole Iraqi Army on its way home in 1991, just as the goal of Bush’s Panama invasion in December 1989 was mainly to destroy the Panamanian Army? History reveals that the removal of ‘dictator’ Manuel Noriega, a U.S. paid CIA asset, was just a pretext for the invasion. I wonder if the Panamanians thought that destroying their homes and killing thousands of civilians in the process was a good price to pay for their newfound ‘democracy’?

Such eloquent words – a “victory over tyranny and savage aggression” – whitewashed evil acts behind the lies. All it took to rally Americans to support this first Gulf War was for a Kuwaiti nurse to tell the story of Iraqi soldiers removing babies from incubators, taking the incubators, and leaving the children to “die on the cold floor.” The ‘nurse’ Nayirah, was in fact the 15-year-old daughter of the Kuwaiti Ambassador in Washington. She was professionally trained by advertising agency Hill and Knowlton to tell the entire fake incubator story.

Not only that, the whole story that led America into the first Gulf War was based on a string of lies. In a video I recently posted with Dr. Rashid Buttar talking about Covid-19, he revealed part of the startling truth behind the lie that America went into this war: to “protect the oil interests of Kuwait after Iraq had set fires on their wells.” Dr. Buttar said that a very close friend (25:40)…told him the story that he, and eleven of his men, in six dune buggies, went out and set those 300 fires. “We created that false flag event so that we could justify our actions,” he said.

Are you starting to get the idea that this “new world order” might not be such a great idea if so many lies are told to justify bombing countries ‘back to the stone age’ and destroying people’s lives to create it? Instead of babies being taken out of incubators and left to die, the stark cold truth is that Americans inflicted horrifying birth defects on Iraqi babies through the illegal use of depleted uranium during George W’s “War on Terror” – a war that was based upon another lie that Iraq “possessed weapons of mass destruction.”

In 2007 General Wesley Clark said that we should be concerned about the strategy of the US in this region in what he called a “policy coup” after 9/11. “What is our aim?” he said. “What is our purpose? Why are we there? Why are Americans dying in this region? That is the issue.” [6]


In the 1939 movie Wizard of Oz, Toto pulls back the curtain to expose the wizard manipulating things behind the scenes. Similarly, men and women have conspired behind the scenes throughout history to reshape the world according to their ideology. The neocons have been pulling strings behind the political scenes since the Ford administration. They are now firmly embedded within the Trump administration, where they continue the chaos they unleashed on the world after achieving their hoped for “new Pearl Harbor” event of 9/11.


With the “War on Terror” marking the beginning of George Orwell’s “continuous warfare,” perhaps it is necessary to take a peek behind the curtain at some of the actors pulling strings in the lead-up to the 9/11 tragedy, and I will return later to George H.W. Bush.

The making of The Medusa Touch, and the Hollywood Scene of 9/11

The producer of The Medusa Touch was Arnon Milchan, a high-level Israeli intelligence agent. In the mid-1980s one of his Israeli companies was involved in a scandal of smuggling components to Israel that can trigger nuclear explosions. While his business associate, Richard Kelly Smyth, was charged with smuggling, Milchan was never formally indicted. [7]

Milchan then went on to became a Hollywood movie mogul with several movie credits to his name including Pretty Woman and The Revenant. He was also producer for Oliver Stone’s, JFK, during which Stone became increasingly frustrated at having to rewrite and rewrite parts of the script. Which is why the movie didn’t tell the truth, the whole truth… But I digress.

Because The Medusa Touch was made in the late seventies when no CGI was available, elaborate models were constructed to simulate an aircraft crashing into a skyscraper.

To create a highly realistic visual impact, great thought would have gone into building and working with these models. It is now very obvious to me that the plane crashing into the skyscraper on the Medusa set is far more realistic than the repeated images we saw on 9/11 of a passenger jet ‘appearing’ to slice into the South Tower like a hot knife through butter.

Above, a ‘plane’ appears ‘buried’ up to the engines and nothing breaks off. It then carries on through the building to emerge through thick steel columns on the other side (below) with not so much as a flattened cockpit. It simply beggars belief.

With a passenger jet’s fuselage made of aluminum, common sense should tell us that a plane could not possibly slice through the thick steel columns that formed a protective heavy duty ‘net’ around both WTC towers, as seen during their construction (below).

Note how thick the steel beams are and how closely together they are placed, which shows why the towers’ windows were so narrow. The WTC Towers were constructed to withstand the impact of a large passenger jet fully loaded. Instead, it looks like Hollywood and the Defense Department colluded to pull off this smoke and mirrors trick to create an image of a plane slicing through these columns as if they were made of soft chocolate.

It might surprise you to hear what Donald Trump said about the attack on the Twin Towers on September 11.

In the split second after the ‘plane’ disappears inside the building, a round hole and a few puffs of white smoke is the only ‘evidence’ that something has penetrated the South Tower.

As with magicians, everything happens so quickly we don’t see their sleight of hand. I had to take numerous screen shots to slow the action down enough to work out what really took place. From the screen shot (above), it is obvious that a plane did not go through the steel columns, and the relatively small hole matches what was also initially seen in the Pentagon that day.

So what made these holes? Perhaps the following video clip may make it clearer that something else hit the South Tower.

After the hole appeared in the South Tower, with a few puffs of smoke, there was an explosion (below).

After the explosion, molten steel was seen pouring from the tower (below). Experts agree that a fire caused by jet fuel cannot reach temperatures high enough to melt steel, so what melted it?

I came across a possible answer to question this in a book written by Juri Lina, Architects of Deception, under a heading More Effective Weaponry. He wrote:

Great Britain is conducting experiments with heat weapons armed with thermo baric ammunition. These weapons can be aimed at a particular building, killing everyone inside with a wave of intensive heat without damaging surrounding buildings, as explained by Paul Beaver of Jane’s Defence Weekly magazine. The missile, which produces high temperatures and high pressure, can be fired from the shoulder. As it detonates inside the building, the pressure wave distributes the heat through doorways and stairwells, consuming everything in its way. The Russians successfully used thermal weapons in Chechnya.

It has been revealed that on 11 September 2001, what is known as termit plasma bombs were used to destroy the twin towers of New York’s World Trade Center, after the two aircraft had hit the towers. These plasma bombs are only available to the United States and Israel, not to terrorists. Shortly before the collapse, several powerful explosions are visible on an uncensored video film. (p. 547)

This then raises the question: Were shoulder-fired missiles launched from somewhere at the Twin Towers? Could this be possible? It just so happens that witnesses reported such an event – from the Woolworth Building, which had an unobstructed view of the Twin Towers. The following video footage showing that at least one, and possibly two, missiles were launched from the rooftop terrace of the Woolworth Building, was captured on an MSNBC live feed as the north tower collapsed.

Several witnesses reported this event. Recorded in the Port Authority Police records at 9:08, the exact time the second plane struck, Sgt. Zika reported “a possible missile launch off the Woolworth Building.” [8]

As we pulled ‘round the corner, we stopped the rig, and a cop walked over to us and said, `I saw them shoot a missile launcher off that [Woolworth] building, you guys better be careful up there.’ — NYC Fireman

“[About 50 yards from the Tower] There was a ‘swooshing’ sound, then an explosion, and it sounded really low. It was if someone, one or two floors above me, had launched a shoulder-fired missile.” — Lance Cpl. Alan Reifenberg

“They’re shooting at the Trade Center from the Woolworth Building.” — Radio Dispatch [9]

Considering all of the above, it should now be clear that there is no way a passenger jet could have withstood such an impact with the WTC Towers and instead, should have looked more like the crash in The Medusa Touch, where the passenger jet exploded on impact with the building, sending plane parts flying through the air within a ball of flames.

The following image shows what part of a Boeing 777 passenger jet’s fuselage looks like after crashing to the ground from over 30,000 feet. Note how thin the aluminum fuselage is and ask yourself how it could possibly cut through the thick steel columns that formed a grid around each of the World Trade Center Towers, when in reality, it should have crumpled like this on impact and broken apart before falling onto the street below.

Crumpled fuselage from MH17, which was shot down over Ukraine in 2014. Photo: Kate Geraghty

Below is part of the wreckage from a Mitchell B-25 bomber that landed in the street after the plane hit floors 78 and 79 of the Empire State Building in 1945 when it became lost in fog trying to land.

The hole made by the bomber (below) in the Empire State Building, where the fire it started was quickly brought under control, and the building was re-opened a few days later. Notice that the plane could not penetrate far inside the building because of the horizontal floor structure. Therefore common sense should tell us that the height of a Boeing 747 is far greater than both the bomber and the space between the floors of the Twin Towers, therefore making it impossible for it to disappear inside the building.

However, in an effort to ‘fool all the people’ it looks like explosives were cleverly used to create this Hollywood effect (below) of a plane’s silhouette against the North Tower’s ‘impenetrable’ steel grid.

To my mind, New York became a giant Hollywood studio on 9/11 and although a lot of real people were killed during the making of this ‘movie’, the special effects, although impressive, considerably stretch the imagination. In another post I will demystify some of the ‘sleights of hand’ that produced such dramatic effects. However for now, consider this: In a March 1962 declassified document, Operation Northwoods, written by the Joint Chiefs of Staff and signed by its chairman, L.L. Lemnitzer, many ideas were described “of pretexts which they consider would provide justification for US military intervention in Cuba.” [10] On page 2, no. 5 under “Discussion” the document states:

The suggested courses of action appended to Enclosure A are based on the premise that US military intervention will result from a period of heightened US-Cuban tensions which place the United States in the position of suffering justifiable grievances. World opinion, and the United Nations forum should be favorably affected by developing the international image of the Cuban Government as rash and irresponsible, and as an alarming and unpredictable threat to the peace of the Western Hemisphere.

On page 10 the document describes switching planes for drones, which are then supposedly ‘attacked’…

8.  It is possible to create an incident which will demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and shot down a chartered civil airliner on route from the United States to Jamaica, Guatemala, Panama or Venezuela.  The destination would be chosen only to cause the flight plan route to cross Cuba.  The passengers would be a group of college students off on a holiday or any grouping of persons with a common interest to support chartering a non scheduled flight.

a) An aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organisation in the Miami area.  At a designated time the duplicate would be substituted for the actual civil aircraft and would be loaded with the selected passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases.  The actual registered aircraft would be converted to a drone.

b) take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rendezvous south of Florida.  From the rendezvous point the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to the minimum altitude and go directly into an auxiliary field at Eglin AFB where arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the aircraft to its original status. The drone aircraft meanwhile will continue to fly the filed flight plan. When over Cuba, the drone will being transmitting on the international distress frequency a “MAY DAY” message stating he is under attack by Cuban MIG aircraft. The transmission will be interrupted by destruction of the aircraft which will be triggered by radio signal. This will allow ICAO radio stations in the Western Hemisphere to tell the US what has happened to the aircraft instead of the US trying to “sell” the incident.

President Kennedy rejected the plans outlined in Operation Northwoods. Paul Craig Roberts, Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury in the Reagan administration, wrote that in Kennedy’s experience with…

“the Bay of Pigs, the Cuban Missile Crisis, and the Joint Chief’s ‘Operation Northwoods,’ he concluded that CIA Director Allen Dulles and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Lemnitzer were both crazed by anti-communism and were a danger to Americans and the world.”

Further, Roberts states that by removing both Dulles and Lemnitzer from their respective positions, Kennedy set “in motion his own assassination.” [11]

Similarly, just as the above plots were designed to manipulate Americans (and the world) into supporting an invasion of Cuba, the attack on the Twin Towers was designed to garner sympathy from the world, which the US used to justify their War on Terror.

Perhaps by now you rightfully think that the perpetrators of such acts are, as Kennedy thought of Dulles and Lemnitzer, “crazed” (but this time by a hatred for Muslims), who are therefore “a danger to Americans and the world.”

The above photos and videos give a sketchy outline of the trickery involved in the biggest deceit ever perpetrated on American soil – not by bin Laden, or Muslims with box cutters, but by a small secret team within the US government with outside help. As bin Laden called it, “a government within the government.” Just as there was a small faction in the US government who wanted to see Kennedy gone so that they could carry out their nefarious plans, there was, and still exists today, a rebel faction, in fact a “secret government” within the U.S. government who want to see the flowering of seeds planted long before them. So let’s return and connect a dot to the seed planted by Arnon Milchan of a remotely hijacked plane (Burton’s thoughts) crashing into a high-rise building, to the remote hijacking of a plane produced by the Murdoch-owned Fox Network in The Lone Gunmen, where its final destination was a World Trade Center tower.

According to journalist, and author of several 9/11 books, Christopher Bollyn, Milchan’s “best friend” was Rupert Murdoch, with whom he collaborated on other television series. Bollyn asks when pondering the uncanny prescience of 9/11, “Was Arnon Milchan the original source of the plotline for this Lone Gunmen episode?” [12] What I discovered after including Fight Club in this article was that Milchan’s production company Regency Enterprises and Fox 2000 Pictures were also both involved in the making of Fight Club.

A Look Behind The Political Scenes Leading Up to 9/11

In order to make more sense of 9/11, it is important to understand the political background at the time Black Sunday and The Medusa Touch were made. In 1977, the year Black Sunday was released and a year before the release of The Medusa Touch, Menachem Begin, former head of the Israeli terrorist gang, Irgun, became prime minister of Israel.

Russell Warren Howe described the beginning of his 1974 film interview with Begin, the “father of terrorism”…

“The red light had come on, under the lens. Without preamble, I turned my shoulder to the camera, stared straight into Begin’s eyes, and asked: ‘How does it feel in the light of all that’s going on, to be the father of terrorism in the Middle East?’ ‘In the Middle East?’ he bellowed in his thick, cartoon accent. ‘In all the world.’” [13]

Born in Russia in 1913, Begin arrived in Palestine in 1942 where he joined Irgun (Irgun Zvai Leumi), and became its leader. Irgun embraced the extremist Zionist ideology of a Greater Israel outlined in Vladimir Jabotinsky’s New Zionist Organization (NZO) in New York, which Benzion Netanyahu (Bibi’s father) headed after Jabotinsky’s death in 1940.

In July 1946, Begin’s gang of Irgun terrorists were responsible for bombing the King David Hotel which housed the British military headquarters, killing 93 people. Not only did Begin want to rid Israel of the Palestinians, but also the British.

On 9 April 1948, Begin’s Irgun terrorists and Yitzhak Shamir’s Stern Gang (LEHI) massacred the inhabitants of Deir Yassin, a Palestinian village. It was part of an operation meant to destroy a blockade on the road to Jerusalem during Israel’s ‘War of Independence.’ The Jerusalem commander of LEHI, Yehoshua Zettler, told a filmmaker in 2009:

“They ran like cats… House after house…we’re putting in explosives and they are running away. An explosion and move on, an explosion and move on and within a few hours, half the village isn’t there any more.”

Afterwards the gang members piled up all the dead bodies and burned them. When news of this reached Albert Einstein, he was outraged. He was against Zionism and wrote a letter to the New York Times:

“Members of the Irgun, which carried out scores of terror bombings in the 1930s and 40s [and its political successors in the Likud party] hold the world view that “political violence and terrorism” are “legitimate tools in the Jewish national struggle for the Land of Israel.” [14]

However, this view was not held by everyone who supported the birth of a Jewish State in Palestine. Although money was raised in the United States to support the terrorist groups of Irgun and LEHI (Stern Gang) through a group know as ‘American Friends of the Fighters for the Freedom of Israel’ in their bid to cleanse Israel of its Arab inhabitants and British occupiers, a rebuttal came from Albert Einstein when Mr. Shepard Rifkin, who was the executive director after the UN Partition of Palestine, requested his support for the Stern Gang’s activities. [15]

The “misled and criminal people” to whom Einstein referred, were “believers in unrestricted and indiscriminate terror,” wrote Arthur Koestler in The Rise of Terrorism. Although Einstein was a devoted Zionist, he strongly opposed the Zionist terrorist gangs that later became the Mossad, Israel’s foreign intelligence agency, and Likud, the extremist right-wing party headed by Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel’s current prime minister. I think Einstein would have turned several times in his grave knowing that these events would follow his death:

  1. Menachem Begin would form the Likud Party in 1977 and become Israel’s Prime Minister.
  2. Second generation members of these terrorist gangs would become leaders in Likud, including Menachem Begin’s son, Benny.
  3. Rham Emanuel, whose father was a member of the Stern gang, went on to become Clinton’s right-hand man, and Obama’s political advisor and first Chief of Staff. [16]

In 1979, the Netanyahu-created Jonathan Institute on Terrorism, held an international conference in Jerusalem to start the global propaganda push for a “War on Terror.” [17] George H.W. Bush also attended and spoke at this conference.

In 1980 Isser Harel of Mossad predicted a 9/11 scenario with this chilling statement to Michael Evans:

[Terrorism] will come to you in America. America has the power but not the will, to fight terrorism. The terrorists have the will, but not the power, to fight America – but all that could change with time. Arab oil money buys more than tents.

As to the where…New York city is the symbol of freedom and capitalism. It’s likely they will strike the Empire State Building, your tallest building and a symbol of your power.

In 1982, Oded Yinon [18] outlined the Israeli plan for a Greater Israel to take over the area from the Nile to the Euphrates, and in the process to carve up the Middle East into small states Israel could easily control. In former Israeli Defense Minister Avigdor Lieberman’s words, “Our conflict is with the entire Muslim world, with the entire Arab world.” Since Iraq was regarded as the lynch pin of the Middle East, it had to be taken out first for the rest to unravel. But to accomplish this, Menachem Begin, the leader of the terrorist group Irgun who became, and was, Israel’s Prime Minister at the time The Medusa Touch was made (1977-1983), would need a lot of help.

In 1988 Bibi Netanyahu returned to Israel from New York and joined the Likud Party, becoming its leader in 1993. In 1990 he was recorded at a meeting at Finks bar in Jerusalem, a well-known Mossad watering-hole. The transcription of this recording has been 100 percent authenticated and includes the following paragraph:

If we get caught they will just replace us with persons of the same cloth. So it doesn’t matter what you do, America is a Golden Calf and we will suck it dry, chop it up, and sell it off piece by piece until there is nothing left but the World’s biggest welfare state that we will create and control. Why? Because it’s god’s will and America is big enough to take the hit so we can do it again, again and again. This is what we do to countries that we hate. We destroy them very slowly and make them suffer for refusing to be our slaves.

Preston James Ph.D, The Hidden History of the Incredibly Evil Khazarian Mafia

James adds to this explosive paragraph:

What Bibi Netanyahu was discussing was the upcoming nuclear attack on America on 9-11-01, and when he mentioned “they will just replace us” he was referring to the top Circle of Twelve, the group he answers to what Veterans Today’s own Columnist and talk show host Stew Webb disclosed to the World by identifying 11 of the 12 who call themselves the “Illuminati” or “Disciples of Satan.”

And then…on 9/11/01 the stuff that only belonged in movies or on TV screens became the ‘real thing’ after all the warnings were ignored. No, I don’t mean the movie warnings if you could call them such, but the warnings made to the CIA and directly to President George W. Bush. Susan Lindauer was warned by her CIA handler in the late summer or early fall of 2001. In an open letter to President Trump that appeared in the American Herald Tribune on 30 July 2018, she stated:

“Though it’s impossible for most Americans to grasp to this day, without question US Intelligence possessed advance knowledge of the 9/11 attack in its precise configuration…

“In precise detail, I told Godfrey, my closest friend in Washington, that the CIA expected a major terrorist attack involving airplane hijackings and/or airplane bombings to strike the World Trade Center, as a known target in New York. The attack – according to the CIA’s advance knowledge that was shared with me – could possibly include a mini-nuclear device to bring down the Towers.” [19]

President Putin warned President George W. Bush on 09 September 2001 that a terrorist attack plotted in Afghanistan was imminent, according to George Beebee, a senior Bush-era CIA analyst. [20]

William (Bill) Cooper, who had previously worked in Naval Intelligence with access to top secret files, also warned of a coming terrorist attack during his radio show on 6 June 2001:

“And now we are being bombarded with messages that Osama Bin Laden is planning to attack the United States of America. And I’m telling you, be prepared for a major attack. But it won’t be Osama Bin Laden, it will be those behind the New World Order. It is very likely that they will stage a terrorist attack and it is going to be big enough that Marshall Law could be declared.” [21]

On the morning of 9/11, after the Twin Towers had collapsed, and before Building 7 experienced the same fate (even though not hit by a plane), three people interviewed at a critical time when Americans were traumatized and wanting answers to what was happening, the following interviews revealed what would become the ‘official 9/11 story’.  This meant that trauma would deeply embed the ‘official story’, making it difficult for people to later erase it from their minds despite new evidence to the contrary.

After the U.S. sent in troops to Afghanistan – supposedly to capture or assassinate Osama bin Laden – the war drums started beating again, this time to go to war with Iraq. Six years later we would learn from General Wesley Clark that the U.S. wanted to take out another six Middle Eastern countries that like Iraq, had nothing to do with the attacks on the World Trade Center.

As General Wesley Clark pointed out at the beginning of the above video, there was a “foreign policy coup” in America. A hard core group of neoconservatives took charge, including at the time Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld, who still remain in charge of foreign policy today no matter who becomes president of the United States. Effectively this kept President Trump mired in the swamp he declared he was going to drain.


References and Notes

Click above to view on a separate page…


Related
The Case That 9.11 Was an Israeli Attack on the US Is ‘Overwhelmingly Strong’ – Ron Unz

” … the attacks must have been the work of a highly sophisticated organization with access to advanced military technology …”

“Once we have concluded that the culprits were part of a highly-sophisticated organization, we can then focus on the Who and the Why, which surely would be of greater importance than the particular details of the How.”


Dr. Alan Sabrosky: “100% Certain That 9/11 Was a Mossad Operation”

 

Confronting Empirical Evidence: What Turned the Twin Towers to Dust?

Kurt Sonnenfeld, a FEMA photographer working at Ground Zero after 9/11, said that whatever destroyed the Twin Towers turned them mostly into “fine dust.” Dr. Judy Wood’s empirical evidence shows what caused this “dustification.”

9/11: “The Anatomy of a Great Deception”

If you still believe the ‘official’ 9/11 story, David Hooper’s documentary of how he began to awaken from the lies we were told, and what he discovered, may get you to rethink what happened that fateful day. His journey began with an innocent question…

Was 9/11 An Inside Job to Create ‘The New American Century’?

Features the Italian documentary The New American Century which exposes the neoconservative cabal who play leading roles in the 9/11 drama.